Showing posts with label movies. Show all posts
Showing posts with label movies. Show all posts

1.20.2006

Wretched sequel

Watched Starship Troopers 2: Hero of the Federation tonight (latest shipment from my Netflix queue). Well, actually that's a bit of an exaggeration; I watched the first part of it, and finally pushed the "Stop" button when it effectively turned into a slasher movie crossed with "Alien".

This movie stunk. It was awful. Bad. Terrible. Atrocious. Disgusting.

Let me put it another way: This movie is not going on my Top 100 list. If I had a Bottom 100 list, it would be in hot contention for #1. (Or #100, depending on how you would number a Bottom 100 list.) The script was bad, the acting was bad, the direction was bad, the special effects were bad, and the plot was virtually non-existent.

I liked the original Starship Troopers, even if it did take considerable liberties with Heinlein's book. That's par for the course with sci-fi movies (and lots of other genres as well). Far from a favorite movie, but OK. The sequel is wretched. I am so glad I didn't pay specifically to rent this from Hollywood Video. With Netflix I'm paying the same no matter how many movies I get. This one's going back tomorrow in exchange for something worth watching.

(As an aside, I saw only one actor that I had ever seen before -- but I couldn't place where I saw him. A quick lookup on IMDB showed that I wasn't imagining things; General Shepherd was played by Ed Lauter, who played the father of the cadet who got killed in the Kolvoord Starburst maneuver in Star Trek: The Next Generation's "The First Duty." I can't imagine the Starship Troopers role did anything for his career.)

Read More......

7.13.2005

The Most Fun You Can Have For $1

So I was browsing through a local Dollar Tree store (not to be confused with Dollar General, All For a Dollar, The Dollar Store, Everything's a Dollar, etc.), and there was this display of DVDs of classic TV shows. Classic as in '50s-'60s. Typically had 3 or 4 episodes each. Most of'em didn't interest me much, but this Flash Gordon DVD with three episodes from 1954-55 caught my eye. I was only 3 to 4 years old when the show aired, but I still have (very) vague memories of watching them. Only a buck? I couldn't resist.

Today I popped it in the player to check out Flash Gordon and the Planet of Death, which happens to be the first episode of the series, and had so much fun that I went on to watch Deadline at Noon and The Subworld Revenge, which both came near the end of the 39-episode series. I laughed my ass off.

Think classic Star Trek had cheesy production values? Flash Gordon is artificial plastic cheese food stuff in comparison. The plots (I use that term loosely), the dialog, the acting, the effects (I can't bring myself to call them "special"), the props -- all so dreadful they're hilarious. The costumes, remarkably, were just about on par with classic Trek's (that silver swimcap Flash is wearing on the DVD cover didn't actually appear in any of these three episodes); heck, Dr. Zarkov's uniform (and his beard) looked as if they might have been the model for the TOS Klingons. True, I wasn't exactly impressed with Flash's form-fitting white T-shirt in Planet of Death. But Dale Arden was, for the most part, attired in a sensible trouser uniform. Come to think of it, she could almost have been the precursor to Majel Barrett's pilot episode "Number One."

Deadline at Noon was a particular hoot. The titular deadline was for the explosion of a "duranium bomb" (tell me Roddenberry didn't steal that name) that had been planted in Berlin in the 1950s by time-travelling aliens. This bomb was going to destroy Earth, and it was planted in the 1950s because it somehow would take around 1250 years for the duranium to explode -- apparently this series is set in the 33rd century. (This sounded like it was intended to be some kind of "radioactive decay" with a long half-life -- they were searching for the duranium with a Geiger counter -- which didn't exactly jibe with the fact that the bomb had all kinds of weird mechanisms that Dr. Zarkov had to disarm when they found it. Or maybe I misunderstood the technobabble; the sound, supposedly "enhanced" according to the DVD jacket, was atrocious.)

Anyway, it's 11 AM of the day it's supposed to explode and blow up Earth at noon, and Flash and his buddies from the Galaxy Bureau of Investigation have exactly one hour to travel back to the "sixth decade of the 20th century," as it was quaintly referred to by Zarkov, and find and disarm the bomb. Evidently this is one of those cases where the time in the past marches in parallel lockstep with the time in the present (i.e., the 33rd century), which makes no sense at all, but whatever. Dr. Zarkov conveniently happens to have brought a time machine aboard the Sky Flash (their cheesy space ship which looks about the size of one of Trek's tiny shuttlecrafts) in his carry-on, and they travel back to the 50s with much less fuss and bother than a slingshot-around-the-sun maneuver entails. They identify some major cities (DC, NY, Paris) from the air, marvel at an "aeroplane" and an ocean liner, and engage in amusing exchanges about how primitive this culture must have been.

At this point I felt as if I had stumbled into ST: Voyager's Future's End or the original series' Tomorrow is Yesterday. The Enterprise -- excuse me, the Sky Flash -- is spotted over Berlin and assumed to be invaders from outer space. The cops (driving an old VW Beetle) are sent to find them after they land, but Flash "freezes" them with his ray gun while Zarkov and Dale locate the bomb and defuse it, two seconds before noon. Dale wants to stick around and look up their ancestors to tell them what the future will bring, but Zarkov says no. (He must be the original Temporal Agent.)

Oh, and if you're wondering why the heck they picked Berlin, of all places, for the location of the duranium bomb, it's undoubtedly because this series was actually filmed in West Berlin.

I can't remember when I had so much fun for a dollar. And I can't wait to get back to the Dollar Tree, because they also had a "Volume 2" Flash Gordon DVD featuring the episodes Akim the Terrible, The Breath of Death, and Claim Jumpers, and I want to see what else the Great Bird stole from them. Only a buck? I can't resist!

Read More......

6.18.2005

Revenge of the Bad Dialog

Well, I finally got around to seeing Revenge of the Sith last night. Even though everyone who saw it before me (i.e., just about anyone who reads my blog, I dare say) has already delivered their commentaries, I'm still going to put in my two cents worth.

First major point is that I enjoyed it. Not that it's going in my top 10 or anything like that, but IMO it's the best of the prequel trilogy by far. I really liked seeing the threads of the story at last tie in to A New Hope and the later movies, from Palpatine's transformation to the wizened Emperor, to the clones appearing in armor that will become the familiar garb of the Imperial storm troopers. And I have to say that visually, Ewan McGregor fits the part of the young Obi-wan very well; it's quite easy to envision him aging into Alec Guinness.

That said, some gripes and a few nits to pick:

  1. Good Lord, the dialog stinks. The most egregious is the references to the "younglings." Other specifics have slipped my mind already, probably because I don't want to remember them.
  2. Good Lord, Hayden Christensen's acting stinks. Granted, he didn't have much to work with in the way of dialog, but neither did Mark Hamill and Harrison Ford in ANH, and they managed to exhibit some personality and emotion. I almost think I preferred Jake Lloyd; he may have been too cute and sappy, but at least he wasn't such a block of wood.
  3. It's been said many times already, and I must concur: Padme rolls over and dies much too easily. It wouldn't have been difficult to have her succumb to complications brought on by injuries sustained at Anakin's hands, thus making more real Palpatine's statement that Anakin killed her.
  4. Either there's something in the air on Tatooine that prematurely ages people, or there are some continuity problems in the timeline. In ANH, Luke can't be more than, what, 18 maybe? That means 18 years elapse between the end of Ep 3 and the beginning of Ep 4. While Ewan McGregor, as I said above, does make a good young Obi-wan to Alec Guinness's older portrayal, an age difference of only 18 years just isn't believable. Owen and Beru Lars also look a bit too young to turn into the Episode 4 versions in 18 years, though the discrepancy doesn't seem as great as for Obi-wan.
  5. It's nice to see that they created an explanation for C3PO not knowing anything about Tatooine or Obi-wan, etc., by having Bail Organa order that Threepio's memory be wiped. It does not, however, explain Threepio's statement in Episode 4 that he wasn't quite sure who the girl in the hologram was -- he said she was a passenger on the ship they were on, and (he thought) a "person of some importance." (That line in fact never even made sense within the context of Episode 4, where he had previously said quite clearly, "There'll be no escape for the princess this time." Obviously he knew exactly who she was.)
  6. At the end it looked like the Death Star was about half done. Apparently it took them another 18 years to finish it. Damn, it's hard to get good help.
Today I pulled out SW: A New Hope (the special edition DVD) to rewatch. It was amusing to pick up little discrepancies created by Episode 3. Most notably, "Old Ben" Kenobi tells Luke that he hasn't been called Obi-wan "since, oh, before you were born." I'd have sworn they were still calling him Obi-wan when they were discussing where to hide the babies. I think old Ben had been living alone in the desert too long and his memory was failing.

Don't know that I'd pay to see ROTS again in the theater, but I'll get the DVD when it comes out to complete my set.

Read More......

5.22.2005

Revenge of the Top 100 Movie Lists

Well, I finally managed to come up with my own Top 100 Movies list. Many are not really Top 100 material, I suppose, but my movie viewing has been limited compared to the rest of you, and a lot that I have seen were so long ago I don't remember much about them. (The whole list of movies that I can ever remember seeing at all is only 165 entries long.) Maybe I should have gone for a more modest Top 50 like Kathy L. did. But the deed is done, so here's my hundred; I'll undoubtedly be kicking some out as I watch more new ones. The ranking of the bottom 40 is kinda nebulous, as I find it difficult to compare 40 so-so apples, oranges, peaches, and bananas in any meaningful way. You can consider it more or less a 40-way tie for 61st place.

Kathy McCracken's Top 100 Movies, v.1.0 (May 21, 2005)

  1. The Lord of the Rings: The Fellowship of the Ring
  2. The Lord of the Rings: The Return of the King
  3. Star Wars: A New Hope
  4. Star Trek: First Contact
  5. The Lord of the Rings: The Two Towers
  6. Indiana Jones and the Last Crusade
  7. Who Framed Roger Rabbit?
  8. My Left Foot
  9. Star Trek II: The Wrath of Khan
  10. Fiddler on the Roof
  11. A Beautiful Mind
  12. Star Wars: The Empire Strikes Back
  13. Fantasia
  14. Ben-Hur
  15. Raiders of the Lost Ark
  16. Independence Day
  17. Rebecca
  18. The Hunt for Red October
  19. Harry Potter and the Sorcerer's Stone
  20. Boys Don't Cry
  21. Spaceballs
  22. Harry Potter and the Chamber of Secrets
  23. The Butterfly Effect
  24. Star Trek VI: The Undiscovered Country
  25. Galaxy Quest
  26. Jurassic Park
  27. X-Men
  28. Men In Black
  29. Star Trek: Generations
  30. Spiderman
  31. Jurassic Park III
  32. E.T.: The Extra-Terrestrial
  33. The Road Warrior
  34. X2: X-Men United
  35. Daredevil
  36. Catch Me If You Can
  37. Rain Man
  38. The Ten Commandments
  39. Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban
  40. Apollo 13
  41. Timeline
  42. Starship Troopers
  43. Planet of the Apes (2001)
  44. Star Wars: Return of the Jedi
  45. I, Robot
  46. The Matrix
  47. Minority Report
  48. The Puppet Masters
  49. The Time Machine
  50. Sahara
  51. Star Trek IV: The Voyage Home
  52. Air Force One
  53. Whatever Happened to Baby Jane?
  54. Star Wars Episode I: The Phantom Menace
  55. Paper Moon
  56. The Graduate
  57. The Count of Monte Cristo
  58. Back to the Future
  59. Crocodile Dundee
  60. Airplane!
  61. Romancing the Stone
  62. Indiana Jones and the Temple of Doom
  63. Spiderman 2
  64. Mad Max: Beyond Thunderdome
  65. Papillon
  66. Jurassic Park: The Lost World
  67. Star Trek Nemesis
  68. Butch Cassidy and the Sundance Kid
  69. The Sound of Music
  70. The Jewel of the Nile
  71. The Odd Couple
  72. Office Space
  73. City Slickers
  74. Men In Black II
  75. Tootsie
  76. Mrs. Doubtfire
  77. Flashback
  78. Frequency
  79. On Golden Pond
  80. Thelma and Louise
  81. An Officer and a Gentleman
  82. Gone With the Wind
  83. King Arthur
  84. The Andromeda Strain
  85. Planet of the Apes (1968)
  86. Star Trek: Insurrection
  87. Back to the Future II
  88. Back to the Future III
  89. Clear and Present Danger
  90. Patriot Games
  91. The Good Son
  92. One Flew Over the Cuckoo's Nest
  93. The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly
  94. Sphere
  95. The Miracle Worker (1962)
  96. Anna and the King
  97. Robin Hood: Prince of Thieves
  98. The Poseidon Adventure
  99. The Day After Tomorrow
  100. The War of the Roses

Read More......

5.20.2005

Coming soon to a Dumpster near you

So, those of you who went to see Episode III already -- did you get your copy of that new collectible movie mag? According to the press release, the 2.5 million copies might be gone from theaters in less than 24 hours. It didn't say where they might have gone to.

Just in case you didn't go to a Loew's, Cinemark, or Carmike theater, or they were already out of stock, not to worry, you can download a pdf version from the mag's website, assuming you want to waste 4.3 MB of perfectly good bandwidth. Methinks my virtual copy is headed for my virtual Dumpster.

Read More......

5.08.2005

How do you pick your Top 100 movies?

I know a lot of you have your own Top 100 movie lists. How do you achieve a rank order for that many movies when you're comparing apples and filet mignon? I mean, I can easily decide whether I liked Fellowship of the Ring more than The Two Towers, or Independence Day more than Minority Report. But how do you decide the relative ranks of Who Framed Roger Rabbit vs. Fiddler on the Roof, or Spaceballs vs. A Beautiful Mind? The genres are so different that it's almost like trying to decide if I like a sci-fi movie more than a historical novel or a Beatles album.

Any insights into your thought processes in this matter will be appreciated.

Read More......